CNN Report Follow-up: Katherine Explains GMOs
- At July 08, 2013
- By Katherine
- In Articles, News
- 2
Genetically Modified Foods: Part II
Your responses to my recent CNN interview were PASSIONATE – on both sides of the issue – regarding GMO’s health and environmental benefits.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) continue to spark passionate debate: Emotions run high regarding studies of the impacts of GMOs on health and the environment.
I was interviewed about GMOs by CNN’s “The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer” which recently reported that Chipotle and many restaurants and food companies in the United States use GMOs. Though Chipotle is one of the few that voluntarily discloses its ingredients.
It’s important to note that scientists in general regard a GMO food nutritionally equivalent to a non-GMO food.
The U.S. government’s stance
GMOs are not allowed in any food certified as organic by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). However, in an online food Q&A, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stated that GMOs have been in the U.S. food supply for about 20 years. The agency also stated in a consumer update that “Foods from genetically engineered plants must meet the same requirements, including safety requirements, as foods from traditionally bred plants.” Such foods, the FDA added, “are generally as nutritious as foods from comparable traditionally bred plants… [They] have not been more likely to cause an allergic or toxic reaction than foods from traditionally bred plants.”
Additionally, Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said there is no safety hazard in using genetically modified soybean oil over conventional soybean oil — a finding the respected organization highlighted recently in its Nutrition Action newsletter.
Hence, the federal government does not require that GMO or non-GMO foods be labeled.
“Food manufacturers may indicate, through voluntary labeling, whether foods have or have not been developed through genetic engineering, provided that such labeling is truthful and not misleading,” the agency stated. “FDA supports voluntary labeling that provides consumers with this information.”
Yes, the GMO debate is still heated and in full swing. There are pros to GM foods —increased yield in staple crops can help to combat world hunger, for example. (Viggy Parr contributed to this report)
For more fabulous tips and simple, effective ways to lose weight,
buy her book, Diet Simple!
Matt Severe
Stop talking about GMO’s. you are a dietitian who wrote a terrible giving tips everyone would know from common sense.
CNN needed someone who has too much free time and a desperate desire for spotlight to to help explain what GMO’s are, in which you completely failed to do. you just said they are “unnatural”, which from an food science educated standpoint has no grounds in the argument. you wanna know whats not natural? the processed foods that literally the entire country eats every day, there is no way around being unnatural.
then you immediately bring up soybean oil’s health risks, which if true is up your alley, but yet those risks have nothing to do with GMO’s (the topic of the interview); but, to make things worse, that one single piece of scientific information you gave them, was immediately debunked by the reporter after the interview
Katherine
Dear Matt,
I appreciate the time you took to read my article (have you read the article as opposed to just seeing the video?). I’m sorry you disapproved and I agree with many of your points. I certainly don’t have too much time on my hands. I’m extremely busy helping people change their health and their lives for the better. A huge task! It’s quite challenging to work with the media given my time constraints. I will be more careful with my words next time.
All the best,
Katherine